Evaluation, Selection and Criteria for Preparation of Case Stories
The evaluation and selection of case studies is carried out according to a methodology developed in the original SUBSPORT project, which will continue to be used for the maintenance of the database. At the centre of the assessment methodology are the SUBSPORTplus screening criteria (see table below) for the evaluation of the hazardous properties of substances. According to these criteria, a list of hazardous substances (SDSC list) has been established, which is part of the database of restricted and priority substances. If an alternative contains a substance on the SDSC list, this alternative is not suitable as a case story unless the use of the alternative is considered safer than the use of the original substance.
In order to utilize information in the published case stories in the best way, please take note of the methodology, which explains the criteria and different sections of the case stories.
The detailed methodology is available as pdf-download. Alternative Assessment Methodology and Data Presentation for the General Database of SUBSPORTplus (PDF, 343 KB)
The case stories have been gathered from different sources. Users of the SUBSPORTplus portal have the opportunity to contribute their successful substitution as a case story. Could your substitution solution be interesting for other users?
In order to ensure a certain quality of the case stories, we ask you to consider the following criteria to decide whether a substitution solution is suitable for the preparation of a case story. SUBSPORTplus lives from your contributions. Contact the SUBSPORTplus team!
Substitution can be accomplished by the use of an alternative, less hazardous substance. In many cases other technologies that do not need hazardous chemicals can be applied. We do not consider the reduction of exposures to dangerous substances, e.g. by means of protective or containment measures like extraction or waste water treatment plants, to be substitution. Case studies are real life situations meant to provide information on possible solutions for safer alternatives to chemicals but also to encourage others to follow the example.
Alternatives matching any of the SUBSPORTplus screening criteria below (see table) can only be published in exceptional cases. Please check the table before submitting a case story.
|CMR||Harmonised classification (according to CLP) for|
CMR categories 1A, 1B
(until 2015 Directive 67/548/EEC: cat. 1 and 2)
IARC cat. 1, 2A, 2B
|(v)P(v)BT||REACH Regulation – Annex XIII|
EC PBT Expert Group
OSPAR List of substances of possible concern
|Endocrine disruptors||Endocrine Disruptor Lists|
EU Endocrine disruptors database cat. 1, 2
SIN List database
|Neurotoxicants||ISTAS RISCTOX Database of Neurotoxicants, cat. 2-4|
|Sensitisation agents||Harmonised classification (according to CLP) for|
(until 2015 Directive 67/548/EEC: for R42, R43)
Measures that will only reduce the level of exposure by e.g. lowering the quantity of used substance, containing or extracting the emissions, water treatment, personal protective equipment, are not considered as suitable case stories. On the other hand, recipe optimisation and low-emission forms of use could be suitable case stories, especially if it is demonstrated that 1:1 substitution by another substance is NOT possible
Substitution requirements for sustainability and safety for man and environment will come more to the fore in the future. Criteria for sustainable and safe alternatives are currently being developed in the EU and will be applied in the selection of case studies. Alternatives that are demonstrated to be safer and bring about sustainable benefits will be increasingly integrated into the database.
Information published by SUBSPORT has to meet the following criteria: