Use of carbon dioxide as alternative for caffeine extraction

Number

149-EN

Section

General Section

Use

Sector

Manufacture of food products

Function

Other

Process

Other

Product category

other

Application

Production of decaffeinated coffee

Abstract

Use of carbon dioxide as alternative for caffeine extraction is already a known alternative to the use of other hazardous substances like dichloromethane, trichloroethylene or ethyl acetate.

Substituted substances

Dichloromethane

CAS No. 75-09-2 EC No. 200-838-9 Index No. 602-004-00-3

Chemical group

Chlorinated Halocarbons

Classification: hazard statements

H351 Suspected of causing cancer

Other adverse effects

The substance is: 2B carcinogen (IARC) as listed in the Substance Database according to SUBSPORT Screening Criteria (SDSC).

Trichloroethylene

CAS No. 79-01-6 EC No. 201-167-4 Index No. 602-027-00-9

Chemical group

Organochloride compound, halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbon

Classification: hazard statements

H350 May cause cancer
H341 Suspected of causing genetic defects
H336 May cause drowsiness or dizziness
H315 Causes skin irritation
H319 Causes serious eye irritation
H412 Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects

Other adverse effects

The substance is: 2A carcinogen (IARC), neurotoxic cat. 4 (Vela et al.) as listed in the Substance Database according to SUBSPORT Screening Criteria (SDSC).

Ethyl acetate

CAS No. 141-78-6 EC No. 205-500-4 Index No. 607-022-00-5

Chemical group

Carboxylic acid esters

Classification: hazard statements

H225 Highly flammable liquid and vapour
H336 May cause drowsiness or dizziness
H319 Causes serious eye irritation

Alternative Substances

Carbon dioxide

CAS No. 124-38-9 EC No. 204-696-9 Index No.

Chemical group

Carbonyl compounds

Reliability of information

Evidence of implementation: there is evidence that the solution was implemented and in use at time of publication

Reason substitution

CMR
neurotoxicant

Hazard Assessment

Substance to be substituted: Trichloroethylene is a Substance of very high concern and is included on the REACH authorisation list, according to Article 62 of Regulation (EG) No. 1907/2006. (REACH Regulation). Dichloromethane is a Substance of very high concern and is included on the REACH restriction list, according to Article 73 of Regulation (EG) No. 1907/2006. (REACH Regulation). Alternative substance: Carbon dioxide is not toxic and has no harmonised classification according to Annex VI of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation), but leakages in confined, unventilated spaces may be hazardous due to oxygen replacement. It is not listed in the Substance Database according to SUBSPORTplus Screening Criteria (SDSC). Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and unless it is generated as by- product or recovered from a natural source, the technology may contribute to increasing the company's carbon footprint.

Description of Substitution

Decaffeinated coffee has the advantage of avoiding health problems and discomfort for people with high blood pressure or other conditions. Extracting caffeine is not new but the means of doing it have evaluated from highly toxic solvents (like dichloromethane, trichloroethylene, which are still in use in some countries) to healthier alternatives, like supercritical carbon dioxide. Supercritical carbon dioxide is forced through green coffee beans. Its gas-like behaviour lets it penetrate deep into the beans, dissolving 97-99% of the caffeine. The quality of treated coffee is superior to that obtained by organic solvent extraction.

Case/substitution evaluation

Extraction with supercritical carbon dioxide is effective and in total safer than organic solvent extraction of caffeine from coffee.

State of implementation

In use

Availability ofAlternative

Alternative available on the market.

Type of information supplier

Research

Contact

Frostburg State University Maryland USA, Dept. of Chemistry, https://www.frostburg.edu/

Other solutions

Genetic engineering: inactivating the gene that codes for caffeine synthase, is still under research and may generate an adverse raction of  people contesting genetic modifiedorganisms.

Type of publication and availability

Internet presentation, freely available

Publication source: author, company, institute, year

The presentation is published by the Frostburg State University Maryland USA, Dept. of Chemistry.

Publication source

Type of publication and availability

http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/101/consumer/faq/decaffeinating-coffee.shtml

Date, reviewed

November 26, 2021